Karl Polanyi
Fictitious commodities and the double movement; re-embed-via-planning answered by correct-the-frame, free-the-interior.
Edition read. The Great Transformation — read in full (OCR-recovered from a scanned edition).
What we took
The substrate charter. The fictitious-commodities thesis — labour, land, and money "are not produced for sale," so commodifying them demolishes society — grounds the earned/unearned line on a provenance test needing no theory of value, and unifies the doctrine's three mechanisms: capability floors de-commodify labour, the commons and the ecological axis de-commodify land, money-demotion de-commodifies money — extensible to a fourth, compute/data. Embeddedness grounds the reframe; "laissez-faire was planned" is the legitimacy ground and the root answer to Hayek; Speenhamland fixes the dividend's design (unconditional, non-wage-contingent, rent-funded).
Where we diverge — and how we answer
Polanyi re-embeds by taking labour, land and money out of the market; Axiacracy re-embeds by correcting the boundary conditions while keeping the market interior — the market-preserving double movement — and closes the authoritarian hatch he left open with the free interior, the unsteered zone, and the Charter.
The net position
The deepest grounding for the substrate treatment and the clearest constitutional self-description — with his one planning-divergence answered by the frame/interior split he himself half-states.
Every position is read at the source. See the whole register on Lineage & Critique, or the doctrine itself in The System.