Elinor Ostrom
The eight design principles as a legitimacy audit; recognize-and-back; the self-governing frame as a first-class third category between market and state.
Edition read. Governing the Commons — deep read.
What we took
Hands the doctrine its eight design principles as a legitimacy audit and failure scorecard; the recognize-and-back guardrail — a central sensing state that erases the frames it cannot see is the master survivability risk; quasi-voluntary compliance (enforcement's real job is assurance, not coercion); nested enterprises finalising the no-apex federation; and the empirical demolition of the Leviathan-or-privatization binary, both of which assume an omniscient, costless enforcer.
Where we diverge — and how we answer
One caution imported rather than a disagreement: her cases were homogeneous communities; Axiacracy's frames are not, so the eight principles carry even more load in a plural polity.
The net position
Hands the doctrine the self-governing frame as a first-class third category between market and state — finalised from a short stub to ancestor; overwhelmingly confirmatory.
Every position is read at the source. See the whole register on Lineage & Critique, or the doctrine itself in The System.